Re: Package Proposal: MVCnPHP
| From: | Jeroen Houben | Date: | Mon, 07 Apr 2003 11:42:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package Proposal: MVCnPHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-14971@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Martin Jansen wrote:
On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 12:07, alan wrote:Okay so I now have a better understanding of why frameworks *could* harm PEAR. I just don't think that this particular class that Tony's suggesting will be a bad thing for PEAR. I think this package is just like any other package in that it tries to create a solution for a specific problem. It is a replacement for stuff like: if ($action == 'view') { bla } etc etc Nothing more, nothing less. Sure it will impact on how you code your applications, but so does the use of PEAR Templating systems. As long as you can still use everything in PEAR without using this package I don't see any harm in allowing it. - JeroenI would like to see some way to include frameworks (like mine eventually when it becomes more stable),This is exactly what I expected to happen: Once we start talking about integrating them, everybody want's to contribute his/her framework. Stig's email from last year summarizes my thoughts about this topic pretty well. I suppose this is the way to go: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=102431151907287&w=2 - Martin Hi,