Re: Package Proposal: MVCnPHP
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:51:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package Proposal: MVCnPHP | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-14984@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 16:08, Tony Bibbs wrote:
> While this may be considered a type of framework, I don't believe it is a
> framework in the sense that Stig was thinking in that email (though I
> could very well be wrong). In fact this is no more a framework than
> things like HTML_Template_Flexy and other template systems. I say so
> because just like those template libraries, MVCnPHP has no real value
> until an application starts using it.
You're right in your argumentation. Thus I think that I'm +1 for your
proposal. Apart from that we should take that we don't clutter the
source tree with other MVC packages, like it has happened with HTML
Templates, e.g., but that MVCnPHP should become the "standard" for PEAR.
- Martin