Re: Package Proposal: MVCnPHP

On 7 Apr 2003, Martin Jansen wrote: > You're right in your argumentation. Thus I think that I'm +1 for your > proposal. Apart from that we should take that we don't clutter the > source tree with other MVC packages, like it has happened with HTML > Templates, e.g., but that MVCnPHP should become the "standard" for PEAR. As I noted in the docs, this MVC implementation is not meant to be a port of the MVC implemented in Java by Struts. To that end, I could eventually see someone wanting to add a Struts compatible version of the MVC to PEAR but outside that I agree 100% that you don't want too many of these sorts of packages. -- Tony Bibbs "I guess you have to remember that those who don't tony@tonybibbs.com hunt or fish often see those of us who do as harmlessly strange and sort of amusing. When you think about it, that might be a fair assessment." --Unknown