RE: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal: MVCnPHP

On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Lukas Smith wrote: > Lets just say we should not let earlier mistakes force us to do the same > mistakes again. Template engines in PEAR are a total mess. > > For this package I would be thankful if everyone took the time and > looked at the code, give us URL like wolfram to alternative packages > etc. > > If the proposed package does become our MVC package then there is > nothing to say that it can't be extended in the future. However it will > probably heavily influence how we can continue in this area in the > future and therefore this decision should not be made lightly. > > At some point we may even do a rewrite aka MVC 2.0 but we should always > try to get as much BC as possible down to road. > I couldn't agree with these comments more. Well put. -- Tony Bibbs "I guess you have to remember that those who don't tony@tonybibbs.com hunt or fish often see those of us who do as harmlessly strange and sort of amusing. When you think about it, that might be a fair assessment." --Unknown