Re: Package Proposal: MVCnPHP

From: Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:01:15 +0000
Subject: Re: Package Proposal: MVCnPHP
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-14989@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
You're right in your argumentation. Thus I think that I'm +1 for your proposal. Apart from that we should take that we don't clutter the source tree with other MVC packages, like it has happened with HTML Templates, e.g., but that MVCnPHP should become the "standard" for PEAR. I thing that thats a bit hopefull. (the one and only framework!) - frameworks are probably more contentious than template engines.
As I said before, raising the barrier on components that are likely to be more common (and implementation strategies could be considerably different) - like templates/frameworks.. to add the doc requirement will mean that we get a few good, well documented frameworks, and let end users decide from a range of quality (as aposed to picking from the trash:) Regards Alan
- Martin
-- Can you help out? Need Consulting Services or Know of a Job? http://www.akbkhome.com

« previous php.pear.dev (#14989) next »