Re: Plans for pear.php.net

Hello, Just read this thread :) Providing an easy and visible interface for package proposals is a very good day, joined with a kind of polls to see if there is a need too. But I do not like to see an automatic system to accept/reject packages after a certain amount of time/hits/pears/apples. This task must be done by an admin, someone who has a good view of PEAR and get the approbations of others admins. Here 'admins' means simply a group of responsable, available persons. I know a lot of the current admins are very busy, but we can find enough volunteers in the active members of the PEAR community. Why am I against an automatic system ? imho, we are not cpan, hotscripts, phpclasses or others scripts archives hosts. We will never get thousands of proposals per week, or if we ll get this amount of proposals, well, PEAR reaches success, and it will be very difficult at all to keep consistency&coherence in the packages tree. just my 2cts, pa