Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_
| From: | Pierre | Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:35:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_ | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43393@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 12 Jul 2006 00:44:28 -0000, Philippe Jausions
<Philippe.Jausions@11abacus.com> wrote:
Philippe Jausions (http://pear.php.net/user/jausions) has commented on the proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_. Comment: Prefixing classes with something clearly marking the class as part of the PEAR framework is definitively needed. Besides that, "P_" is the most unsexy thing to use. Yes it's short, but frankly that would actually hurt PEAR, from a marketing prospective,Please and for my own sanity, leave marketing for other people. We try to take technical and pragmatic decisions instead of focusing on some irrelevant points... That said, I don't P_ unsexy at all. I actually like it. --Pierre