Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:36:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_ | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43529@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Markus Tacker wrote:
Hoi Alan, On 7/19/06, Alan Knowles <alan@akbkhome.com> wrote: Anyway we have talked about requiring the extending of an interface class with the name of the prefix. This would fix your issue, wouldn't it?I think Alan is just ranting :) We obviously should not make things needlessly hard for editor developers, but if there is even a slight reason to improve something, the problems of editor developers are not of our concern. They will find solutions. Like I said they can allow people to hook in some code/config to set their __autoload() implementation. Also alot of editors facilitate the idea of library directories or grouping of related files into project's to figure out what auto completion hints they should be giving. regards, LukasNot sure how that helps you - if you autoload the interface, you have the same problem...I am sorry but I don't understand your problem. What solution do you prefer or what change to the RFC do you propose?