Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_

Markus Tacker wrote:

So, no news on this for about 2 Months. Before I start the vote I'd like to add a note that says:

If you have objections against the "P_" prefix, please mention which prefix is the one you prefer in the comment of your vote. Every positive or conditional vote with such a comment will be counted and the prefix with the most votes will be used. A positive vote without a comment is a vote for "P_". Prefixes which have arised during the creation of this proposal are: P_, Pear_, PEAR_. You are free to chose your own.

Ok?

I think that is a bad idea. You are changing the RFC from "use this prefix" to "use some sort of prefix that some of us have agreed upon". I think we should pick one prefix and vote on that. That way you won't hear too many complaints later about how the selected prefix didn't get enough votes to pass through PEPr on its own or how it didn't get a popular majority, etc. Scott Mattocks