Re: [PEPr] -1 for RFC::Prefix all classes with PEAR_
| From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith | Date: | Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:15:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] -1 for RFC::Prefix all classes with PEAR_ | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44328@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Joshua Eichorn wrote:
You did read the RFC right. The only examples are a php4 packages. And the word ALL is 5th word in the RFC.yes i did read it ..
Were doing PEAR 2.0 all packages target php 5.1+ and have a prefix of PEAR_, no new packages will be allowed in PEAR 1.0honestly i think a lets start from scratch approach is best too. but i do not think that this will get a majority. i would love to see an updated CS (with all the group regulations and maybe some idea borrows from eZ), updated PEAR core package and all new namespace and packages. all using a new organizational structure. pear 1.0 can live on during that time. and it will be 6 months before pear 2.0 can produce anything stable. regards, Lukas