Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_
| From: | Craig Constantine | Date: | Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:10:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_ | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44265@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
--On October 3, 2006 1:29:18 PM -0400 Scott Mattocks <scott@crisscott.com>
wrote:
>>> Prefixes which have arised during the creation of this proposal
>>> are: P_, Pear_, PEAR_. You are free to chose your own.
>>
>> Ok?
>>
>
> I think that is a bad idea. You are changing the RFC from "use this
> prefix" to "use some sort of prefix that some of us have agreed upon". I
> think we should pick one prefix and vote on that. That way you won't hear
> too many complaints
I agree: Select the prefix you think is best (i'd take the proposal
comments into account of course). And move the thing to voting. If it's
shot down, then start another proposal with one of the other prefixes.
I'm in for "P_". This is PEAR (with emphasis!) The biggest, best, most
established collection of PHP code. Let's own the monolithic "P_" prefix.
-OR- let's shoot down the proposal in voting...
-c