Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:18:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_ | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44271@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 10/3/06, Paul M Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: Seriously, PEAR_ should be the prefix. PEAR_ or Pear_, not a single letter, agreed.+1 again from me. While P_ is "easy", it doesn't say anything. If we're using a prefix it should say what we are. We are PEAR, not P. -- Justin Patrin