Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:38:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_ | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43395@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>> Besides that, "P_" is the most unsexy thing to use. Yes it's short, but
>> frankly that would actually hurt PEAR, from a marketing prospective,
>
> Please and for my own sanity, leave marketing for other people. We try
> to take technical and pragmatic decisions instead of focusing on some
> irrelevant points...
Well, marketing does matter, the question is usually how far you should
take it.
Alan has a point with namespaces, even if their very existence is still
an unsure matter.
> That said, I don't P_ unsexy at all. I actually like it.
>
> --Pierre
>
Arnaud.