Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_

Scott Mattocks wrote: > Markus Tacker wrote: >> So, no news on this for about 2 Months. >> >> Before I start the vote I'd like to add a note that says: >> >>> If you have objections against the "P_" prefix, please mention >>> which prefix is the one you prefer in the comment of your vote. >>> >>> Every positive or conditional vote with such a comment will be >>> counted and the prefix with the most votes will be used. A >>> positive vote without a comment is a vote for "P_". >>> >>> Prefixes which have arised during the creation of this proposal >>> are: P_, Pear_, PEAR_. You are free to chose your own. >> >> Ok? >> > > I think that is a bad idea. You are changing the RFC from "use this > prefix" to "use some sort of prefix that some of us have agreed upon". I > think we should pick one prefix and vote on that. That way you won't > hear too many complaints later about how the selected prefix didn't get > enough votes to pass through PEPr on its own or how it didn't get a > popular majority, etc. Seriously, PEAR_ should be the prefix. Arnaud.