Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_

From: Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:19:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Prefix all packages with P_
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43525@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Markus Tacker wrote: > Hoi Alan, > > On 7/19/06, Alan Knowles <alan@akbkhome.com> wrote: >> You realize that make writing code editors a nightmare ;) >> autocompletion/code hinting etc. will never work.... > > Hm, I not into this. But does the code hinter really know about class > trees or just about with classname has which methods? It will do when I get back to writing it ;) It parses the include / require calls, has a list of include paths, and can load any PEAR style require_once / include. in reality, variable class includes will confuse it no end. - autoloaders even more... - but at present, this situation is a minority/edge case, if you autoload everything, it ends up being very messy... > > Anyway we have talked about requiring the extending of an interface > class with the name of the prefix. This would fix your issue, wouldn't > it? > Not sure how that helps you - if you autoload the interface, you have the same problem... Regards Alan

« previous php.pear.dev (#43525) next »