Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:50:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Proposal for RFC::Prefix all packages with P_ | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43407@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pierre wrote:
On 11 Jul 2006 22:10:29 -0000, Markus Tacker <m@tacker.org> wrote:Err, whats wrong with what he said? All he said that there was a Date class (ok .. so it was just a dummy to reserve the class name) in one of the releases and it was disabled due to issues with PEAR. I think this proposal is fine and we have discussed the topic before. Now the main question is what prefix to use. regards, LukasMarkus Tacker (http://pear.php.net/user/tacker) proposes RFC::Prefix all packages with P_. You can find more detailed information here: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=420Why did you start directly to the proposed phase without *first* discuss it here? Also the contents is wrong. 5.1 does not introduce a Date class. Please go back to draft. Let first discuss quietly this problem. There is no need to hurry.