Re: Template Proposal
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Thu, 08 Nov 2001 20:06:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Template Proposal | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-2685@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 08 Nov 2001, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to agree... I love the concept of Smarty, and it's fine
> for designers with some programming experience, but if they only use
> Photoshop/Golive or Fireworks/Dreamweaver then they don't understand it...
> it seems to be the {section} bits which cause the most confusion - try
> giving them a dynamically generated table to edit :-)
I know that {section} is not the most obvious tag, but is there a better
alternative that preserves its functionality yet is easier to understand
for Dreamweaver people?
> There again, you cannot dynamically generate a table using other template
> engines, so it's not really a criticism of Smarty - whichever way you
> generated the table they'd still have a job changing its look in
> Dreamweaver (let alone FrontPage)...
:)
-Andrei
* Non-volatile, random-access, analog memory store... a book. *