Re: Template Proposal

Quoting jim winstead <jimw@apache.org>: > i think this distinction between 'core' and 'not-core' is rather > arbitrary. the control over a piece of code should lie with the people > who are developing it. that group should be responsive to the people > using the code. (directly, or through other pieces of code that rely on > it.) > > decentralization and federation is where it is at, not centralization. > > with centralization, you just get crap like coding standards that worry > about tabs versus spaces. or people who aren't even responsible for > developing smarty telling those that are that they have to name their > method calls a certain way to have smarty distributed through pear. That's one vote for CPAN-style. -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org> "What was and what may be, lie, like children whose faces we cannot see, in the arms of silence. All we ever have is here, now." - Ursula K. Le Guin