Re: Template Proposal

jim winstead wrote: > > but i see a lot of really loaded terms ('pear developer', 'standard core > library') being thrown around that signal to me that there are people > who presume a world that is a lot more black-and-white than it is. > The "standard core library" will be a special package avaible to download at pear.php.net with a set of packages inside that are supposed to be installed always if you want to use other Pear classes. There was long time ago a discussion about this topic and that was the final decision. How will they be selected? Don't have the answer but sure with common sense and evaluating things like reusability, number of users, number of packages that depends on it plus the habitual things like coding standars, quality, etc. Who is a "pear developer"? IMHO the people who have contributed with more number of packages, are actively supporting Pear (reviewing, fixing bugs, enhancing) and/or perhaps also have more time involved, have some kind of extra karma, but anyone who has contributed classes to Pear can be considered a pear developer. Tomas V.V.Cox