RE: [PEAR-DEV] Template Proposal
| From: | Graeme Merrall | Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2001 12:08:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] Template Proposal | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-747@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> >> as my preffered template class. I know that we have IT[X], but many
> >> people have reported critical bugs but the class seems to be
> >> unmaintained/unusable.
> > I had never read about bugs or problems with IT[X] on the
> german mailinglist
> > or
> > newsgroup.
> >
> Please refer to :
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=98587858602578&w=2
>
Exactly. That was at the end of March and it's July? IT[X] was checked in
and little or know work.
http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php4/pear/HTML/IT.php
shows a small change 3
months ago and previous to that was the inital check in 5 months ago.
I'd say this is dead in the water. If Ulf is listening can he give us an
ETA?
That does leave PEAR without a template engine which I think is a critical
addition to PEAR. Obviously there are are plenty of options available. A
couple popular ones of the top of my head are:
FastTemplates
PHPLIB templates
Smarty (which uses PEAR but isn't PEARified
A quick look at the phpclasses site yields a large number of template
classes as well.
Thoughts? Opinions?
My 2c is removal of IT[X} +1
Cheers,
Graeme