Re: Template Proposal

Andrei Zmievski wrote: > > But if you want the templates to be edited by third-party > > designers, and I mean designers, not developers, you're usually > > better off with IT[X] or similar systems that don't place control > > structures in the templates. As long as you can live with the > > performance hit, anyway. > > And with the lack of nice features, such as modifiers. Yeah, that's something I'd like to see in IT[X], besides compilation and other things, and I don't think it's impossible to do it or would break the concept of IT[X]. IT[X] programming iterface is really nice, the best i've seen so far. Ulf may not have the time to maintain IT[X], but he did a really good job on the API. I don't think we should abandon IT[X], but rather improve it, it's concept is too good. Still, IT[X] and Smarty are different concepts and there should be room for both in PEAR. regards Wagner -- "Ein Mathematiker ist eine Maschine, die Kaffee in Theoreme verwandelt." Paul Erdös, Mathematiker, 1913-1996