Re: Template Proposal
| From: | Jon Parise | Date: | Fri, 09 Nov 2001 19:17:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Template Proposal | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-2748@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:01:18PM -0500, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
> Personally, the way to break it out seems to be not to merge
> them, but to have two layers: A core set of classes like DB,
> Log, Mail, etc, that have been adopted by pretty much everyone
> and aren't duplicated inside the core. They have consistent
> style, strict standards, and are actually kept under reasonable
> API control, etc.
That's an interesting idea.
We could, in theory, have "officially-sanctioned" PEAR code that
lives in cvs on cvs.php.net. That would have to follow all of
our guidelines.
Then, we could have all of the other "contributed" code.
The main PEAR package browser on pear.php.net should still list
all of the packages, but some would be marked "official" (or some
other term that doesn't necessarily assume everything else is
less official or inferious) or "contributed".
--
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Information Technology (2001)
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House
Member