Re: Resurrecting the Function Renaming Thread

Phil Driscoll wrote: [snip] > I beg to differ :) > I've just checked through the list of functions in the manual, and without > actually counting, I would have said that there are more function names > which don't have underscores in the name (not counting the libname_ prefix, > where present) than those that do. Hence removing rather than adding is a > smaller change. I'm only talking about aliasing here, so I don't propose to > break anything. Phil, you have a twisted mind - I am envious. : ) However, I still don't think that removing underscores would be a good thing. > That said, I don't mind which way it goes as long as it goes! I was only > trying to find a way of keeping the C fraternity (which includes me) happy. Got it - I suppose that it is good that we keep an open mind while doing this. :) --zak