Re: Direction for the Function Renaming Effort

From: Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 14:09:08 +0000
Subject: Re: Direction for the Function Renaming Effort
References: 1  Groups: php.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to php-qa+get-2347@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> yep. :) I was just joking. But I _can_ actually imagine > a language based on static classes. You can tell the dogs > of war that they need not to worry about this, because > it's just like functions, and for novices there's no > difference between _ and ::. Use underscore, dot or to > colons, WTF. > > (I don't know whether such a design would be implemetable > or anything, just looking at it from to user land. Besides, > this is going OT.) > Well, it looks like Zak's been reading the ML archives. The original proposal can be found here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=96056798011005&w=2 I think the main reason against it is that it would make things slower, still, its an option--- -Sterling

« previous php.qa (#2347) next »