Re: Direction for the Function Renaming Effort

From: Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 12:28:22 +0000
Subject: Re: Direction for the Function Renaming Effort
References: 1  Groups: php.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to php-qa+get-2345@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
yep. :) I was just joking. But I _can_ actually imagine a language based on static classes. You can tell the dogs of war that they need not to worry about this, because it's just like functions, and for novices there's no difference between _ and ::. Use underscore, dot or to colons, WTF. (I don't know whether such a design would be implemetable or anything, just looking at it from to user land. Besides, this is going OT.) At 13:15 8.2. 2001, Phil Driscoll wrote the following: -------------------------------------------------------------- >I know we're into religious territory, and since we all know that there are >plenty of people in each camp and another set in the middle, we should make >sure that php caters for them all :) >-- >Phil Driscoll >Dial Solutions >+44 (0)113 294 5112 >http://www.dialsolutions.com >http://www.dtonline.org ------end of quote------ ____________________________________________________________ Cynic: A member of a group of ancient Greek philosophers who taught that virtue constitutes happiness and that self control is the essential part of virtue. cynic@mail.cz

« previous php.qa (#2345) next »