RE: [PHP] php vs cold fusion

From: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:40:13 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] php vs cold fusion
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-22752@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> If PHP isn't already, I feel it will soon be a superior tool for > server side > coding than many other languages including CFM. However, CFM has a wide > support base via a commerical organization. In my experience, CF is great right up until the time you need to do something that it's not designed to do... With PHP, the sky is the limit. And with great error reporting, design time with PHP is very small compared to other alternative languages like perl or cf. > PHP is getting this too, but > one real problem with PHP is the lack of PHP knowledgable programmers. We have a whole office full of knowledgable PHP programmers, did you need my contact info? Depends on your perspective I guess. > I > can feel the PHP ranks growing and once the "boss-man" sees a reasonable > size supply of people to work on his storehouse of internal PHP > code, he may > adopt it outright. Until then who can blame folks for "buying in" to > commercial solutions that have a decent supply of talent to back it up. Talent or no talent, PHP's 'Free' price tag beats CF prices by miles. I've seen quite a few not-so-talented cf programmers before too. Again, your info is brought about by perspective and experience. > Code Fusion is not going anywhere soon, but PHP will quickly > become just as > valid a method of server side programming. PHP is _already_ a 'valid' method of server side programming, did I miss something??? Greg

« previous php.general (#22752) next »