Re: php vs cold fusion

We serve over 1,000,000 dynamic page views a day. If Cold Fusion is more stable than PHP, then it has to do better than NEVER CRASH. That's right. Our web site has never been down to a PHP problem (or apache for that matter) -- for over 1.5 years. We used to run Apache+php3, now we run Apache+php4. Same stability, but PHP4 is lighter and not as resource intensive. Where is your proof to your claim that Cold Fusion is more stable than PHP3/4? I've just presented you with my proof. We do PHP big, and I mean big! If this isn't enterprise level, then I don't know what is. Obviously we are not Yahoo!... but only Yahoo! is Yahoo!. Your systems are only as good as you make them. -jeremy brand --- Joe Stump <joe@earth.care2.com> > wrote: >> > 2) Coldfusion - more stable than PHP3/4 > >To quote a website that randomly pops up on my website "I think someone put a >little too much crack in their cereal this morning!" --Slashdot post > >Reference: http://www.miester.org >(PHP Simple Quotes at http://www.miester.org/software) > >--Joe > > >================================================================================ >= Joe Stump joestump98@yahoo.com >http://www.miester.org = >================================================================================ > "Real programmers don't comment their code. > It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand." > >-- >PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net >For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net >To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net == _______________________________________________________________________ GnuPG Fingerprint: 9F5E 95E0 1CC2 E054 84EA 6099 8ACD 9DBA D2C0 5EA9 _ http://www.JeremyBrand.com/Jeremy/Brand/Jeremy_Brand.html for more __ _____________________________________________________________ Get Your Own Private, Free E-mail Now! your_name@smackdown.com http://www.smackdown.com <spacer>