RE: [PHP] php vs cold fusion
| From: | Adi Wibowo | Date: | Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] php vs cold fusion | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-23251@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, jeremy brand wrote:
> >I don't think it's fair to say it bagged PHP. It pointed out
> >valid, acknowledged flaws. There's a database API being worked
> >on at the moment, which could have done with a mention.
> >
> >Jason
>
> I think the naitive DB access is a benefit. I like not having the extra layer of fat
> (abstraction) to deal with.
> Ultimately, for me, I want something to be as fast as possible.
>
> -jeremy brand
Yeah, me too.
We don't change database engine as often as we can, do we?
So why add another layer between apps and database?
I ever programmed using Delphi to access to MS Access. If I know that I
can use more native way to do that (currently only available ODBC), I
will use that. But it is slooowwww.
Performance first!!
Easyness second!!
Adi Wibowo -------------------------------
* Work matter : adiw@peter.petra.ac.id
* Private matter : adiwibowo@excite.com
------------------------------------------