RE: [PHP] php vs cold fusion

From: Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] php vs cold fusion
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-23251@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, jeremy brand wrote: > >I don't think it's fair to say it bagged PHP. It pointed out > >valid, acknowledged flaws. There's a database API being worked > >on at the moment, which could have done with a mention. > > > >Jason > > I think the naitive DB access is a benefit. I like not having the extra layer of fat > (abstraction) to deal with. > Ultimately, for me, I want something to be as fast as possible. > > -jeremy brand Yeah, me too. We don't change database engine as often as we can, do we? So why add another layer between apps and database? I ever programmed using Delphi to access to MS Access. If I know that I can use more native way to do that (currently only available ODBC), I will use that. But it is slooowwww. Performance first!! Easyness second!! Adi Wibowo ------------------------------- * Work matter : adiw@peter.petra.ac.id * Private matter : adiwibowo@excite.com ------------------------------------------

« previous php.general (#23251) next »