Re: Need new name for connect_object()

I'm probably being too simplistic here, but what about connect_other() since it does the same things as connect, including parms, but it does it for another object. Madeleine D. At 09:40 AM 3/21/05 -0800, you wrote: >Actually, it does pass the rest of signal arguments. So, if normally it >passes, for example: > >function ($widget, $row, $col) >{ >} > >Then connect_object() would invoke it with only $row and $col. Don't >know if it makes sense.. > >On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Scott Mattocks wrote: >> Andrei Zmievski wrote: >> >it and make a new method. So far I came up with connect_direct() and >> >connect_without(). Any others? >> >> Since it only passes user defined parameters >> connect_user_only() >> >> Since it doesn't pass the signal >> connect_no_signal() >> >> Since it doesn't pass any system defined parameters >> connect_no_system() >> >> Scott > > > >- Andrei > >-- >PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >