Re: Need new name for connect_object()

Not really. What it does currently is "omit" the signal object, passes the rest of parameters, adding on the user specified-ones at the end. So, if originally the parameters to be passed were ($signal_widget, $col, $row), and we connect it as: $w->connect_object('foo', 'myfoo', $myobj); the parameters it'll pass are ($col, $row, $myobj). I guess what I am asking is whether this behavior is useful at all, or if we would rather really substitute the user specified object instead of the signal one, or not pass any signal parameters at all, or what. Or maybe have a connection function for all three cases: 1) connect normally: pass signal widget plus additional signal-specific parameters 2) connect replace: substitute user-specified object instead of the signal one, and pass additional signal-specific parameters 3) connect simple: pass only user specified parameters -Andrei On Mar 21, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Madeleine D. wrote:

I'm probably being too simplistic here, but what about connect_other() since it does the same things as connect, including parms, but it does it for another object. Madeleine D.