Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

Hi! > for that to happen you need a corrupt CoC team, a fairly unknown N Define "corrupt". They may believe they are doing the world a huge favor by getting us rid of horrible, terrible, no good N. The problem is that they'd be doing it without needing any consensus and will have a good chance of manipulating the rest into agreeing with them as they would control the information. People can be mistaken, and 3 people is small enough group that they can be mistaken in the same way very easily. > but still, this to happen would need all of the above and the first > controversial case would reveal the corruption of the members or the > flaws of the process and we could fix that. Why not fix it by not creating a setup for this upfront? There's no reason for creating secretive unaccountable CoC that is allowed to shut up people without seeking consensus. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com