Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

On Jan 7, 2016 11:38 PM, "Paul M. Jones" <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:37, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:17, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> If someone starts to put bad pressure on another person (harassment, > >>> insults, personal attacks, etc) trying to make this person either > >>> abandon an idea, RFC or even to force this person to leave the > >>> project, the attacker will most likely use non php.net's channel. > >> > >> In which case there are existing means at their disposal: blocking, muting, junk-foldering, reporting to the channel owner for abuse, etc. > > > > Indeed. And it is also obvious that we cannot take actions to block > > the harasser on non php.net's channels. However this was not my point. > > > >> If the harasser cannot actually reach their target, does that not have the same effect? > > > > No, it does not have the same effect. > > Why not? The harassment has been nullified. Are you saying that a person has his place in php.net after being proven gulty of harassment or other similar events? To me, definitely no. And this is why I think we should consider all channels, and name a few examples to make that point clear.