Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

> On Jan 5, 2016, at 09:55, Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:29 PM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If there's an accusation, then *due process* needs to be applied. If it rises to the >> level of needing *due process* then the police should be involved. There's no need, *none at >> all*, for a star chamber *or* a mob to be an amenable authority to salve someone's hurt >> feelings and ban someone else, not even in a temporary capacity. > > Isn’t this RFC setting up the due process? (/me shakes head) No rights of the accused, for one. Opaque star chamber for another. Vague and indefinable terms for a third. It's a *political* action designed with a *political* intent, to enforce *political* in-group at the expense of a *political* out-group. -- Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php