Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

> On Jan 7, 2016, at 13:15, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 8, 2016 1:58 AM, "Paul M. Jones" <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I notice you did not answer my question. I'll ask again: when you say "proven >> guilty" what exactly do you mean? > > I see you are going to nitpick here. So let clarify it. When we're talking about banning people as a result of their actions, we'd better be clear on the details, don't you think? > If there is a clear set of evidences that someone harassed, insulted, attacked another person > then it fits this definition. What to you would be "a clear set of evidences"? (If you have examples of actual occurrences, that would be better than building hypotheticals, and probably easier.) > Please keep in mind than harassment, attacks or insults have nothing to do with opinions. Unfortunately, too many people confuse "argument" with "harassment", and "disagreement" with "attacks", and "observations" as "insults." So I'd like to hear first what "clear evidence" means to you. -- Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php