Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

> On Jan 9, 2016, at 19:39, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Bishop Bettini <bishop@php.net> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 9, 2016, at 09:43, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 9, 2016 10:16 PM, "Paul M. Jones" <pmjones88@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 8, 2016, at 23:25, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul's early reply in this thread were over aggressive >>>>> >>>>> You are wrong. At best, it is "your opinion" only. >>>> >>>> I am not wrong nor right. You were aggressive. And it is not only me >>>> saying. that if you check this thread. >>> >>> I've checked it and I don't see the "aggressive" you are talking >>> about. >>> Can you be more precise? Quoting my actual sentences would be good. >> >> >> Within the framework of the alternative PHP Contributor Etiquette, a >> moderator would jump in about now. The email would go something like this: ... >> Pierre, when you say "Paul's reply [was] over aggressive", you're >> presenting >> an opinion word as a logical truth. Instead, consider phrasing like "I felt >> Paul's reply was over aggressive". That phrasing signals you're expressing a >> valid, true feeling you have rather than labeling the reply. (/me nods) In the interest of improving my communications, I think it would be constructive if he quoted verbatim the exact sentences that I wrote that led him to apply that label. Pierre? -- Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php