Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

On 08.01.2016, at 07:47, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think anything in this thread warrants the term "attack" or > "harassment". While I strongly don't agree with the tone being used > nor the tactics being used, I don't think they warrant any sort of CoC > violation. But who gets to decide that for future instances of... let's call them "heated debates"? The person who feels offended in some way, or merely disagrees? This sheer subjectivity IMO is the biggest issue here. > Sure. I'm sure there are a lot more that aren't talking that are > against it. But I think you proved my point here which is that people > are afraid to share their opinion here. That is a strong indicator > that something isn't healthy *today*. It says nothing about the > potential solution, but it should act as a pretty strong heuristic > that "status quo" isn't really good either. I was not hesitant (or, let's maybe call it "intentionally procrastinating") to post on this topic because I felt unsafe on this list or in the general realm of the PHP community; I simply was in no mood to deal with a mob of self-proclaimed-or-not "Social Justice Warriors" and their digital pitchforks on twitter or elsewhere - and they're already trying: https://twitter.com/drupliconissad/status/685489458934841344