Re: Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
| From: | François Laupretre | Date: | Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:56:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-90247@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 07/01/2016 10:03, Peter Cowburn a écrit :
Just replying on the anonymous RFC votes side-topic.The reaction was mostly caused by the fact that the change had been introduced without prior discussion. Once again, in the light of the recent STH votes, I think we have good reasons to re-evaluate Hannes' arguments :This was tried once [1] and there was an immediate knee-jerk reaction [1] which resulted in quickly removing the feature. Maybe the winds have changed between then and now?That's another question. Ideally, votes should be anonymous, even onRFCs. Scalar type hints have proved that seeing other's vote may be a very bad thing.
- The author of the RFC can no longer bribe and "convince" individual person to change his/hers vote - Your vote is more meaningful now, as it could actually be the winning vote
- First 5 votes one way? No point in voting the other way (or at all) - Last minute twitter "lets all vote yes/no to change the vote around" doesn't work - The "I just wanna be in the winning/loosing team" is difficultRegards François