Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

> On Jan 4, 2016, at 20:31, Michael Cullum <m@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > > Huge +1 to this for the reasons stated both by Eli about why it should > exist, and the reasons mentioned by Ferenc in that it's not giving out new > powers, but adding accountability to the use of those powers. I do think > however there is some fine tuning that could be done. > > 1) When a summary report is posted, the offender should be given the The "offender"? Not "the accused", not "the alleged offender", not "the presumed innocent until proven guilty", but "the offender". *This* is why the RFC is awful, horrible, anti-free-speech, etc. It abides no concept of liberty to speak. The RFC is virtue-signaling for a particular political persuasion, and nothing more. It does serve one useful purpose: to help identify who wants to be an authoritarian and shut down speech from others. -- Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php