Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
| From: | Paul M. Jones | Date: | Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:24:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-90395@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 13:07, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul M. Jones [mailto:pmjones88@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 7:28 PM
>> To: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
>> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 23:52, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you think we can find 5 people in the PHP community that we can
> trust
>> to make fair decisions (NOT that we would always agree with, but that
> are
>> fair) that don't fall too far into "thought policing", in *any*
> direction? If not,
>> then the community is already lost beyond all hope and we should all
> just
>> give up now. I do not believe that to be the case, at all.
>>
>> Too long spent in a position of power, and even the most fair can become
>> unfair.
>>
>> As I have suggested before: *if* there is to be a response team, let it
> be
>> randomly selected on per-reported-incident basis from the pool of
> voters.
>> Then there is no possibility of a charge of continuing bias, and it
> distributes
>> power among the pool, instead of concentrating it into a few members.
>>
>> Proponents of the response team: thoughts?
>
> I think that depends on the nature of the response team.
>
> If it's a mediation team, with the sole purpose to mediate - but otherwise
> cannot impose a solution - it's actually better to have a 'professional'
> one, rather than a random one. I'd still have them voted on and changed
> every so often (2 years that Larry proposed sounds reasonable), but given
> the almost nonexistent risk of abuse, it's not much of a concern.
>
> If it's a judicial body of any sort - then it's a lot more complicated.
> I'm not sold on a randomly chosen team - but I think it is superior to a
> voted team. FWIW, it's quite different from a jury - as there's no judge
> to guide things through, and there is no law to refer to.
Both fair points. (FWIW I'm not in favor of a judicial response team at all, but *if* there is
to be one, randomly-selected is less-bad than a standing team.)
--
Paul M. Jones
pmjones88@gmail.com
http://paul-m-jones.com
Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
https://leanpub.com/mlaphp
Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
https://leanpub.com/sn1php