Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct

From: Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 18:58:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Draft] Adopt Code of Conduct
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-90295@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 12:14, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:47, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Are you saying that a person has his place in php.net after being proven gulty of >>> harassment or other similar events? >> >> When you say "proven guilty" what exactly do you mean? >> >> Merely that someone *feels* harassed does not, to me, rise to the level of "proven >> guilty". It may objectively be true, or not. But regardless of what is objectively true, when >> people *do* feel harassed, there are means at their disposal to stop receiving the harassment: >> blocking, muting, junk-foldering, etc. > > So you are saying that it is fine to keep an harassing person inside > project, correct? As long as the harassed person can block this > person? I still have hope that it is not what you think. I notice you did not answer my question. I'll ask again: when you say "proven guilty" what exactly do you mean? -- Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php

« previous php.internals (#90295) next »