Re: On PEAR quality issues and natural selection
| From: | Paul M Jones | Date: | Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:05:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: On PEAR quality issues and natural selection | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27232@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi again,
One of the forums has this to say:
A solution? Make PEAR a package manager/installer. Also a public repository in charge of namespaces. Insist on complete test coverage and documentation rather than rejecting on grounds of duplication. If a module became unpopular or has too many a bug, record this fact and make it public. Let the library self select.http://forums.devnetwork.net/viewtopic.php?t=17235&start=15 (lastcraft, Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:50 pm) I have to say I like this idea. It is, of course, a complete re-purposing of the PEAR ideal. But it would open up both the competitive fronts while at the same time retaining quality standards (coding standards, documentation, etc). -- Paul M. Jones Savant: the simple alternative to Smarty. http://phpsavant.com/