Re: On PEAR quality issues and natural selection
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:44:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: On PEAR quality issues and natural selection | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27245@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Paul M Jones wrote:
On Apr 9, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Richard York wrote:Well to this point I have seen little criticism but alot of incoherent FUD to be honest. Paul you know me. I take criticism seriously. But there is little here that I is worth reading. Lets see how this thread develops. regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07I don't know if PEAR-CORE is watching right now; I'm hoping they respond with something more constructive than "if you don't like it you can leave." :-(I have to say I like this idea. It is, of course, a complete re-purposing of the PEAR ideal. But it would open up both the competitive fronts while at the same time retaining quality standards (coding standards, documentation, etc).After listening in on PEAR-DEV for the past few months I agree entirely, I feel that PEAR has entirely too much beauracracy. A great deal of it is counter-productive, IMO.