Re: PFC (was: On PEAR quality issues and natural selection)
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Fri, 09 Apr 2004 17:37:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PFC (was: On PEAR quality issues and natural selection) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27295@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver wrote:
I would like to request that PEAR developers review PEAR_PackageFileManager and determine its worthiness as a PFC. It has full unit tests, docs, and has been stable for quite some time with no open bugs. It only depends on the PEAR package, which I guess by nature must be PFC. This of course raises "what is a PFC" again - full unit tests - full documentation - stable - many downloads (how many is many?) - peer-reviewed - no open coding bugs for more than a certain amount of time (how long?) - willingness to let QA step in immediately with both cvs commits and package drops/releases - PEAR CS - no stupid stuff (sudden BC breaks, stable too early, etc.)See this post: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=104612175324131&w=2 As well as the summary from last years a'dam meeting: http://pear.php.net/news/meeting-2003-summary.php As this RFC has never been put to the test of reality there may of course we room for improvements. regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07